64818 3 3
|DanSmigrod private msg quote post Address this user|
Have you used Matterport and immoviewer?
How would you compare the two?
If you looked at both solutions - and picked one - which one and why?
|Post 1 IP flag post|
|JakeRees private msg quote post Address this user|
|What Up @dansmigrod,
I don't personally use immoviewer, but I work as a consultant with a company who does.
My biggest issue with immoviewer is the lack of a true structure behind it like Matterport or Realvision provide- They have gotten way way better than when I first looked at their product, but it still needs some tweaks in my opinion.
Next would be the load time to move from scene to scene. Maybe I'm impatient being a millennial and all, but it seems rather drawn out compared to other systems.
Pros: Cheap rig set up and very cost effective. You could have 4 rigs w/ hosting for years for the cost of 1 MP.
Simple to shoot.
Can offer 360 video without addition equipment thanks to the theta.
Can shoot google trusted very simply - again thanks to the theta
I think for know I will stick with my trusty dslr and fisheye- But as tech continues to improve i think the 360 camera will take over just because of the speed factor. 2 second vs 60 second capture will be a major factor
|Post 2 IP flag post|
|Metroplex360 private msg quote post Address this user|
|I'd use Cupix over Immoviewer if I was not using Matterport.|
|Post 3 IP flag post|
This topic is archived. Start new topic?