Cupix versus Matterport: Construction Project Progress Monitoring8723
61007 2 2
|DanSmigrod private msg quote post Address this user|
|Cupix 3D Tour courtesy of Cupix
If you have a need for construction project progress monitoring, Cupix makes Matterport irrelevant. (See Cupix tour above)
✓ speed of capture
✓ side-by-side comparison (compare weekly progress)
In this SPAR3D interview posted in the WGAN Forum ...
✓ 'Matterport Cortex gets quick 3D from 360° photos using AI/Computer Vision'
Matterport Senior Business Development Manager Tomer Poran acknowledges this challenge:
"Matterport knows that there’s still one parameter that it needs to improve to capture the 3D visualization market for AEC and FM: speed."
"Poran says getting the best quality results still requires using a tripod, and still requires standing out of the way when the picture is snapped. This allows Cortex to scan at about 7,000-8,000 square feet per hour." [Cortex]
"Users are able to scan without a tripod if they prefer. This will increase your speed to about 10,000 – 20,000 square feet per hour–a great speed for documenting large facilities and projects–but results in a lower quality visualization and the presence of the operator in the image. Matterport recommends the following non-tripod methods, in order from least blur to most: a mounting stick, sticking it on your hardhat, or holding the device in your hand."
Plus, the Cupix SLAM app (beta) enables rapid capture of a space -- 25,000 SQ FT per hour -- using a Ricoh Theta V or Insta360 One X, for example.
Your thoughts on Cupix versus Matterport for Construction Project Progress Monitoring?
✓ WGAN Forum Related Discussions
✓ CUPIX Versus Matterport in AEC Space
✓ WGAN-TV: Cupix SLAM App
✓ WGAN Forum discussions tagged: Cortex
|Post 1 IP flag post|
This topic is archived. Start new topic?