Matterport 3D Tour Pros  |  Google Street View Pros  |  Real Estate Agents  |  3rd Party Service Providers
Should I buy a Camera? Quiz How Much to Start 3D Tour Business? Calculate How Much Can I Make as a Pro? Calculate Win More Listings? Calculate
Option #1
Find a 3D Tour Photographer Map
We Get Around Network Find a Pro Service
Matterport Service Provider? Join We Get Around Network
Option #2
Book a Matterport Pro in 60 Seconds
We Get Around Network Instant Booking Service
Powered byKoaWare
Matterport Service Provider (USA)? Join KoaWare Free! Register Now
Last 30 Days: 35,145 Page Views | 8,916 Visitors | 61 New Members
WGAN Knowledge Base | Total Posts: 53,712  |  Total Topics: 7,977
4,464 WGAN Members in 119 Countries
We Get Around Network Forum
WGAN Training Academy (Learn more)
WGAN-TV Channel
@Metroplex360 Chris Hickman: Getting Started
MPEmbed: an Overlay for Matterport Showcase
360Google Street ViewGSV

Blur faces GSV8287

Bryan private msg quote post Address this user
Hi,

i am having some troubles publishing a Matterport tour to gsv.

I have to blur out faces in just 5 360's. But when i use the option when uploading the tour it also blurs out the faces of a wall painting.


When i upload the tour on gsv trough matterport they automatically go straight online on gsv and not in the private folder so there is no more option to just blur out the faces that needs to be blured out.

Anyone who can help me out?
Post 1 IP   flag post
Standard
Member
Chemistrydoc private msg quote post Address this user
I've had a similar issue once before.

I basically downloaded a 360 snapshot from every camera position, manually blurred the ones that need blurring, then recreated the tour using Cupix, publishing to GSV through them.

It's tedious, but Matterport doesn't leave many options here.

Hysterical that the Matterport algorithm detects cartoon faces as faces!

Best Luck -

Keith
Post 2 IP   flag post
Gladsmuir private msg quote post Address this user
Hi Bryan,
As a long serving GSV pro can I say that in the early days Google were fanatical about blurring faces.
In reality they care very little any more.
If the faces belong to staff or people who have no objection to being shown, then I personally would not bother with blurring.
Oliver
Post 3 IP   flag post
WGAN
Founder
DanSmigrod private msg quote post Address this user
@Bryan

This WGAN Forum discussion may be of interest to you:

Matterport Face Blurring (Beta) versus CUPIX Blurring: Which do you prefer?

@Chemistrydoc

Wow! That's a workaround (that should not be necessary).

Happy Thanksgiving,

Dan
Post 4 IP   flag post
54352 4 4
Log in or sign up to compose a reply.
destitute