Connecting 3D/360° Virtual Tour Buyers to Service Providers powered by
the Most In-Depth, Relevant and Up-to-Date Content and Training for the 3D/360° Community
Join FREE! 50+ Benefits
Find a 3D Tour Photographer Map
We Get Around Network Find a Pro Service
Matterport Service Provider? Join We Get Around Network
Book a Matterport Pro in 60 Seconds
We Get Around Network Instant Booking Service
Matterport Service Provider (USA)? Join KoaWare Free! Register Now
One Order  |  One Quote  |  One Contact
Book Multiple USA Commercial Locations
  • ✔  As-Builts
  • ✔  Construction Progress
  • ✔  Facillities Management
Last 30 Days: 53,772 Page Views | 12,798 Visitors | 96 New Members
WGAN Knowledge Base | Total Posts: 63,163  |  Total Topics: 9,903
5,471 WGAN Members in 129 Countries
We Get Around Network Forum
WGAN-TV Training U in Matterport
WGAN-TV: Now Playing
3DVR: Fast-Start Websites for Matterport
Service Providers with Angus Norriss
WGAN-TV Training U
21 Subject 'Matter' Expert Instructors
30+ Courses | 10+ Major Topics
Training via Recorded Videos
Free for WGAN Basic, Standard
and Premium Members
WGAN-TV Program Schedule | Need Help? | Podcast
360Google Street ViewGSV

Blur faces GSV8287

Bryan private msg quote post Address this user
Hi,

i am having some troubles publishing a Matterport tour to gsv.

I have to blur out faces in just 5 360's. But when i use the option when uploading the tour it also blurs out the faces of a wall painting.


When i upload the tour on gsv trough matterport they automatically go straight online on gsv and not in the private folder so there is no more option to just blur out the faces that needs to be blured out.

Anyone who can help me out?
Post 1 IP   flag post
Standard
Member
Chemistrydoc private msg quote post Address this user
I've had a similar issue once before.

I basically downloaded a 360 snapshot from every camera position, manually blurred the ones that need blurring, then recreated the tour using Cupix, publishing to GSV through them.

It's tedious, but Matterport doesn't leave many options here.

Hysterical that the Matterport algorithm detects cartoon faces as faces!

Best Luck -

Keith
Post 2 IP   flag post
Gladsmuir private msg quote post Address this user
Hi Bryan,
As a long serving GSV pro can I say that in the early days Google were fanatical about blurring faces.
In reality they care very little any more.
If the faces belong to staff or people who have no objection to being shown, then I personally would not bother with blurring.
Oliver
Post 3 IP   flag post
WGAN Forum
Founder
DanSmigrod private msg quote post Address this user
@Bryan

This WGAN Forum discussion may be of interest to you:

Matterport Face Blurring (Beta) versus CUPIX Blurring: Which do you prefer?

@Chemistrydoc

Wow! That's a workaround (that should not be necessary).

Happy Thanksgiving,

Dan
Post 4 IP   flag post
63959 4 4
This topic is archived. Start new topic?
destitute