Matterport 3D Tour Pros  |  Google Street View Pros  |  Real Estate Agents  |  3rd Party Service Providers
Should I buy a Camera? Quiz How Much to Start 3D Tour Business? Calculate How Much Can I Make as a Pro? Calculate Win More Listings? Calculate
Option #1
Find a 3D Tour Photographer Map
We Get Around Network Find a Pro Service
Matterport Service Provider? Join We Get Around Network
Option #2
Book a Matterport Pro in 60 Seconds
Now Available In Georgia
Coming Soon Across the USA
Photographer? Join Free! Register Now
We Get Around Network Instant Booking Service
Powered byKoaWare
Matterport Service Provider (USA)? Join Free! Register Now
Last 30 Days: 49,830 Page Views | 10,808 Visitors | 83 New Members
WGAN Knowledge Base | Total Posts: 51,376  |  Total Topics: 7,414
4,244 WGAN Members in 117 Countries
We Get Around Network Forum
WGAN Training Academy (Learn more)
WGAN-TV Channel
WP3D Models WordPress Plugin Developer Ross
Peterson and MPEmbed Developer Chris Hickman
We Get Around Network Instant Booking Service  |  Powered by KoaWare
Photographer? Join Free! Register Here  |  Coming Soon Across the USA
Art GalleryCritiqueScanning

Constructive Criticism Please...5736

Queen_City_3D private msg quote post Address this user
Hi All,

Working with an art gallery on a model and need some feedback...

Besides removing excess scan points and editing start position, what are your thoughts on this model:



(Note: Some scans were put to left or right of art work if the painting had glass so as not to see the camera's reflection).

It appears that the client isn't overly happy as they like another model they've viewed (not ours) and don't think the 2 quite match up as being same quality. Here's the one they are comparing to:

[matterport]https://matterport.com/3d-space/mirus-art-gallery/[/matterport]

What's funny is that this second model (which isn't ours) was obviously taken before Matterport did the correction for the yellow walls due to lights.

Any suggestions for improvements on the first model link?
Post 1 IP   flag post
Helen private msg quote post Address this user
@Queen_City_3D What are they not happy with? It looks good! And yes the walls are much whiter on yours. On the other example you gave they also did not trim properly on the mirror as seen it the doll house view.

With models like these and houses with exposed beams. I wish there was a way to take the ceiling off the doll house view it would look so much cleaner!
Post 2 IP   flag post
JakeRees private msg quote post Address this user
I can normally find a reason to bitch about a flaw in anything, but besides the spaceing, which I understand in this case because of the artwork, its pretty much flawless.

The main problem I would say is the fact that their is no contrast on about 3/4 of the work- white walls with white frames and then a light blue- it worked well for the other gallery due to the fact that the artwork was: 1 Large and 2 Contrasted the walls with the vibrant and dark colors.

Overall I would say you did a great capture of the place and the issue is with whoever did the layout
Post 3 IP   flag post
sbl110 private msg quote post Address this user
Hi Queen_city_3D,

Not sure what the client is unhappy about. Your scan points are more frequent and closer together allowing the viewer better angles of the art. In the Mirus Art Gallery sample, it seems like there are large gaps between scans.

While I've never scanned a venue like this, I think that it would be interesting to have lowered the camera for some of the views of the statues. Other than that, I prefer yours over the Mirus Art Gallery.

I think you did a much better job.

Scott
Post 4 IP   flag post
51979 4 4
destitute