Matterport 3D Tour Pros  |  Google Street View Pros  |  Real Estate Agents  |  3rd Party Service Providers
Should I buy a Camera? Quiz How Much to Start 3D Tour Business? Calculate How Much Can I Make as a Pro? Calculate Win More Listings? Calculate
Option #1
Find a 3D Tour Photographer Map
We Get Around Network Find a Pro Service
Matterport Service Provider? Join We Get Around Network
Option #2
Book a Matterport Pro in 60 Seconds
Now Available In Georgia
Coming Soon Across the USA
Photographer? Join Free! Register Now
We Get Around Network Instant Booking Service
Powered byKoaWare
Matterport Service Provider (USA)? Join Free! Register Now
Last 30 Days: 80,278 Page Views | 11,723 Visitors | 60 New Members
WGAN Knowledge Base | Total Posts: 50,546  |  Total Topics: 7,241
4,160 WGAN Members in 115 Countries
We Get Around Network Forum
WGAN Training Academy (Learn more)
WGAN-TV Channel
CUPIX White-Label 3D Tour Player with
CUPIX Director of Sales Scott Anderson
PricePricingScansStrategyStreet View

Cost of Matterport Scans Processing Changes?4904

tocha private msg quote post Address this user
I am trying to get a movement going to change some pricing structure at Matterport. Please let me know your opinion of the following ideas and if you like, send a link to this post to raise awareness and get traction.

I believe Matterport (and MSPs) would increase their bottom line by changing their processing fees. An idea of this would be:

up to 10 scans Free
10-25 scans 4.95
25-50 scans 9.95
50-100 scans 19.95
100-150 scans 29.95
150-210 scans 39.95

This would open up more experimentation and discovery of more applications for the medium. It would encourage MSPs to safely venture into new territories and open up new opportunities. In return Matterport would have (I believe) a huge uptick in processing fees.

Thoughts??
Post 1 IP   flag post
Standard
Member
Chemistrydoc private msg quote post Address this user
Great idea, but they'll never go for it
Post 2 IP   flag post
Standard
Member
Radie842 private msg quote post Address this user
I love it. I think that’s a great plan!
Post 3 IP   flag post
ron0987 private msg quote post Address this user
@tocha
I agree with up to 10 scans free. I am not as big a fan of the rest. For me I over scan most properties in an attempt to look at the end project and turn off scans I don't like but not restricted to a simple.walk thru of only the scan points captured. I also have found when I convert to point cloud the point cloud is better. So increasing the price would not work for me but I understand your concert.
Post 4 IP   flag post
ShowcasePros private msg quote post Address this user
I appreciate the effort. Matterport investors will see that as "French for the word less". I doubt that they will even consider it. I really think 19 for small and 38 for large is pretty manageable. I'm only interested if they raise the price. Thoughts?
Post 5 IP   flag post
tocha private msg quote post Address this user
@chemistrydocQuote:
Originally Posted by Chemistrydoc
Great idea, but they'll never go for it
Why not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ron0987
@tocha
I agree with up to 10 scans free. I am not as big a fan of the rest. For me I over scan most properties in an attempt to look at the end project and turn off scans I don't like but not restricted to a simple.walk thru of only the scan points captured. I also have found when I convert to point cloud the point cloud is better. So increasing the price would not work for me but I understand your concert.
I am talking about reducing the pricing based on processed scans not sure I follow where you see a price increase?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShowcasePros
I appreciate the effort. Matterport investors will see that as "French for the word less". I doubt that they will even consider it. I really think 19 for small and 38 for large is pretty manageable. I'm only interested if they raise the price. Thoughts?
What would be less about it? I would think if they did the numbers they would see much more.
Post 6 IP   flag post
ron0987 private msg quote post Address this user
You are right to early in the morning.πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€. I just need to go back to bed.
Post 7 IP   flag post
JC3DCX private msg quote post Address this user
It will become quite difficult to trace costs and double check your scans with MP, now it's quite simple and I include a standard rate into the scan cost.

I don't want to quote a client for 50 scans and then starts to stress when I see that I will be using more on a project.
Post 8 IP   flag post
tocha private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by JC3DCX
It will become quite difficult to trace costs and double check your scans with MP, now it's quite simple and I include a standard rate into the scan cost.

I don't want to quote a client for 50 scans and then starts to stress when I see that I will be using more on a project.


Quote your projects the same. The customer has no idea what you pay Matterport unless you tell them. What this structure would allow is the opportunity for MSPs to think outside the real estate box. Do you think a car dealer will pay $30 per car just so you can cover your processing fee and make a couple of dollars? What about a sculpture or work of art or a tiny house? The way the processing pricing is being treated now is limiting the MSPs thinking. (IMHO)
Post 9 IP   flag post
51143 9 9
destitute