Connecting 3D/360° Virtual Tour Buyers to Service Providers powered by
the Most In-Depth, Relevant and Up-to-Date Content and Training for the 3D/360° Community
Join FREE! 50+ Benefits
Find a 3D Tour Photographer Map
We Get Around Network Find a Pro Service
Matterport Service Provider? Join We Get Around Network
Engage an EyeSpy360 Service Provider to
Shoot, Create and Publish the tours for you.
for WGAN Forum Members
One Order  |  One Quote  |  One Contact
Book Multiple USA Commercial Locations
  • ✔  As-Builts
  • ✔  Construction Progress
  • ✔  Facillities Management
Last 30 Days: 62,924 Page Views | 16,249 Visitors | 99 New Members
WGAN Knowledge Base | Total Posts: 65,023  |  Total Topics: 10,269
5,727 WGAN Members in 133 Countries
We Get Around Network Forum
WGAN-TV Training U in Matterport
WGAN-TV Live at 5
RELA Booking/Billing Platform for Real Estate
Photographers with RELA CEO Mike Land
WGAN-TV Training U
50+ Courses | 35+ Free Courses | 50+ Subject Matter Experts
Seeking Training?
Succeed Faster WGAN-TV Program Schedule | Need Help? | Podcast
Capture 2.xproblemScans

Camera Placement versus alignment/stitching394

WGAN Forum
DanSmigrod private msg quote post Address this user
Originally Posted by @ron0987
One thing I did notice is on stitching and this may need to go in a different thread, is that I noticed camera placement and stitching. I have found that when I am close to a wall, door or in a threshold that the photo stitching and alignment is off, Has anyone seen this and if so have you tried camera placement at different distances to see if this goes away and approximately what distance you get a smooth blend,. I have sent a message to Matterport to see what they say.

Post 1 IP   flag post
CKC private msg quote post Address this user
Thanks Dan.

I will try a new scan with the new cam and keep you guys posted.

Hi @ron0987 - have you discovered more?
Post 2 IP   flag post
CKC private msg quote post Address this user
Latest feedback from MP's Bob:

"I did get a bit more information from engineering regarding this issue and wanted to pass it along. As i mentioned early on in this event, while i personally had never seen this specific artifact in the past, engineerings initial response was that under the right circumstances the rare appearance of this artifact would not be considered abnormal. Still, given the high volume of occurrences with your original camera the decision was made to provide a replacement. Since your initial report of the issue, we have noted a few more occurrences with other cameras. Given this additional data, the current consensus is that a recent software change has caused this issue to become more prevalent. Engineering has assigned this issue a high priority and is actively working on a resolution."
Post 3 IP   flag post
WGAN Forum
DanSmigrod private msg quote post Address this user
@CKC Wow!

Thank you for this update about the firmware update.

I imagine that the MP team will want to get this fixed pronto. Glad you helped them identify this ...

Post 4 IP   flag post
65862 4 4
This topic is archived. Start new topic?