Matterport 3D Tour Pros  |  Google Street View Pros  |  Real Estate Agents  |  3rd Party Service Providers
Should I buy a Camera? Quiz How Much to Start 3D Tour Business? Calculate How Much Can I Make as a Pro? Calculate Win More Listings? Calculate
Option #1
Find a 3D Tour Photographer Map
We Get Around Network Find a Pro Service
Matterport Service Provider? Join We Get Around Network
Option #2
Book a Matterport Pro in 60 Seconds
We Get Around Network Instant Booking Service
Powered byKoaWare
Matterport Service Provider (USA)? Join KoaWare Free! Register Now
Last 30 Days: 49,512 Page Views | 10,499 Visitors | 41 New Members
WGAN Knowledge Base | Total Posts: 52,710  |  Total Topics: 7,741
4,341 WGAN Members in 118 Countries
We Get Around Network Forum
WGAN Training Academy (Learn more)
WGAN-TV Channel
How to Make Money in the AEC Space for Newbies
Portland, OR-based ToPa 3D Founder Paul Tice

GSV VR Ready (NCTech / Matterport) disappears!7260

3rd Party
Service
Metroplex360 private msg quote post Address this user
https://developers.google.com/streetview/ready/

Last year's 'Ready' designations are down to 2. Unless I was snoozing, there was no mention of these programs being terminated.

Before GSV Summit:

Post 1 IP   flag post
Standard
Member
leonvanzweel private msg quote post Address this user
A quick look at the specs tells me that NCTech Pulsar is compliant to the STREETVIEW PRO GRADE and that the Ricoh Theta V (with summer upgrade - 5fps) are compliant with the STREETVIEW STANDARD specs.
Post 2 IP   flag post
Basic
Member
mcuddy private msg quote post Address this user
So if you look at the list of cameras that was released in another thread they seem to align with the 2 new colours, Matterport still in there. https://www.google.com/streetview/publish/
Post 3 IP   flag post
Premium
Member
DanSmigrod private msg quote post Address this user
@Metroplex360

I could imagine that Google concluded that the four different Google Certification categories are confusing and now simply refer to cameras, platforms and software as Google Street View Ready.

Dan
Post 4 IP   flag post
Premium
Member
scott_cupix private msg quote post Address this user
If I remember correctly from the Q&A session with CA at the SV Summit Google is nixing the VR Ready program and prioritizing other opportunities. The key term in VR ready is "geometry" meaning that a 3D object would have been pushed to SV. This is disappointing to Matterport (takes 3D scans), and apparently NC Tech, and of course Cupix (generates a 3D Mesh).
Post 5 IP   flag post
3rd Party
Service
Metroplex360 private msg quote post Address this user
@scott_cupix @DanSmigrod I thought that 'VR Ready' was a bit of a bad term ... because, Scott is quite correct - the idea was that Google wanted to use 'geometry'.

And yes, I was EXPECTING this to be fulfilled by Cupix, Matterport and NC Tech. NC Tech's device failed to launch, which would have left Cupix and Matterport.

I will say that during the Q&A session that I attended, Charles Armstrong did make a side acknowledgement that there was something special about devices that auto align and understand 3D geometry. It was a nod to Matterport, but it was an open ended one that would have been inclusive of Cupix.

I'm not sure that there was much to read in beyond the fact that the current state of indoor tours is a mix mash of panoramas placed in an adhoc approximate matter. Anyone who is serious about proper placement of panoramas in the real world for potential machine learning reasons would find correctly placed images containing geometry much much more useful and while there may not currently be any initiatives at Google to use this data -- there is still interest.

That's my 100% completely read-between-the-lines inferred take away.
Post 6 IP   flag post
Premium
Member
TrustedPhotoDC private msg quote post Address this user
Per CA in a breakout session, the team and resources working on VR ready, were moved to the AR team or already part of it, and priorities changed.
Post 7 IP   flag post
53335 7 7
destitute